New York Radio Message Board

Click RELOAD on Your Browser To See New Posts!

[ Search Board! ][ WMCA Page ][WABC Page ][Board Home Page]

[Spring Apple Bites]

[ Board Reflections for May 2 (Podcast)]

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

Long Versions Vs. Short Versions Revisited - Jeff Gast 20:04:51 05/15/08 (4)
- Re: Long Versions Vs. Short Versions Revisited - Will Burpee 20:32:32 05/15/08 (3)
  - Re: Re: Long Versions Vs. Short Versions Revisited - Dan A 23:36:47 05/15/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Long Versions Vs. Short Versions Revisited - SKlein 21:56:19 05/15/08 (1)
    - Re: Re: Re: Long Versions Vs. Short Versions Revisited - John Barrett 23:07:42 05/15/08 (0)
The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Harvey Rice 10:16:09 05/15/08 (34)
- Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Neil Leibowitz 00:11:32 05/16/08 (0)
- Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Ted David 20:25:34 05/15/08 (0)
- Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Nick 19:49:45 05/15/08 (1)
- Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Terry Moore 16:36:21 05/15/08 (3)
  - Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Paul 22:08:00 05/15/08 (1)
    - Re: Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Nick 22:19:18 05/15/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Will Burpee 17:19:23 05/15/08 (0)
- Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Harvey Rice 15:33:46 05/15/08 (4)
  - Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Michael L. 16:03:59 05/15/08 (3)
    - Re: Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Harvey Rice 18:59:50 05/15/08 (1)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Steve 19:20:12 05/15/08 (0)
    - Re: Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Robert Casey 18:16:25 05/15/08 (0)
- Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Sid Schweiger 15:05:04 05/15/08 (2)
- Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Bob Smith 14:55:12 05/15/08 (0)
- Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Walt 12:57:37 05/15/08 (0)
- Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - C. Coyne 10:35:17 05/15/08 (0)
- Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Jerome 10:35:15 05/15/08 (11)
  - Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Josh M 12:08:09 05/15/08 (3)
    - Re: Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Will Burpee 17:31:22 05/15/08 (2)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Jeff Gast 19:52:31 05/15/08 (0)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Mike Seaver 18:08:33 05/15/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Harvey Rice 10:53:18 05/15/08 (6)
    - Re: Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Peter Q. George 11:06:58 05/15/08 (4)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Marc 17:18:40 05/15/08 (0)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Rob D. 12:14:32 05/15/08 (0)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Ralph Hahn 12:08:48 05/15/08 (1)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Sue Simmons Situation - What's Up With That? - Wes Richards 12:50:33 05/15/08 (0)
Can somebody please explain? - Vince Santarelli 09:31:49 05/15/08 (6)
- Re: Can somebody please explain? - Frank Thomas 10:47:20 05/15/08 (4)
  - Re: Re: Can somebody please explain? - Ron Gerson 19:11:47 05/15/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Can somebody please explain? - Vince Santarelli 11:14:43 05/15/08 (2)
    - Re: Re: Re: Can somebody please explain? - Frank Thomas 11:44:25 05/15/08 (1)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Can somebody please explain? - Vince Santarelli 13:17:39 05/15/08 (0)
- Re: Can somebody please explain? - Steve G 10:14:26 05/15/08 (0)
WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - Barry 08:57:49 05/15/08 (14)
- Re: WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - Lorenzo 12:50:26 05/15/08 (0)
- Re: WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - Josh M 12:15:00 05/15/08 (0)
- Re: WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - SKlein 09:12:57 05/15/08 (11)
  - Re: Re: WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - Peter Q. George 09:28:45 05/15/08 (10)
    - Re: Re: Re: WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - Chris DeBello 09:55:19 05/15/08 (0)
    - Re: Re: Re: WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - SKlein 09:36:52 05/15/08 (8)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - Steve Green 10:02:42 05/15/08 (7)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - David Gleason 12:16:07 05/15/08 (6)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - Glenn 15:54:45 05/15/08 (5)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - David Gleason 17:36:17 05/15/08 (4)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - David Gleason 18:07:35 05/15/08 (3)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - Craig 20:31:43 05/15/08 (2)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - SKlein 20:40:40 05/15/08 (1)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WSKQ Sued For Commercial Masquerading as Contest - Marc B 21:44:24 05/15/08 (0)
Bob Grant - 60 years on the radio! - Walt 08:10:43 05/14/08 (9)
- Re: Bob Grant - 60 years on the radio! - Stephen Johnson 11:02:59 05/14/08 (6)
  - Re: Re: Bob Grant - 60 years on the radio! - Lee P. 13:32:02 05/14/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Bob Grant - 60 years on the radio! - Joseph Owens 11:14:59 05/14/08 (4)
    - Re: Re: Re: Bob Grant - 60 years on the radio! - Marshal 23:06:07 05/14/08 (0)
    - Re: Re: Re: Bob Grant - 60 years on the radio! - Mike 18:49:01 05/14/08 (2)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Bob Grant - 60 years on the radio! - Allan W. 21:52:21 05/14/08 (0)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Bob Grant - 60 years on the radio! - VicFusco 21:07:46 05/14/08 (0)
Gloria Estefan... ENOUGH! - Allison Miller 22:18:08 05/13/08 (9)
- Re: Gloria Estefan... ENOUGH! - Pete Kemp 15:47:49 05/14/08 (0)
- Re: Gloria Estefan... ENOUGH! - SKlein 12:21:23 05/14/08 (2)
  - Re: Re: Gloria Estefan... ENOUGH! - Jason T 20:23:51 05/14/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Gloria Estefan... ENOUGH! - Walt Parker 16:48:00 05/14/08 (0)
- Re: Gloria Estefan... ENOUGH! - Mark Bloom 23:46:58 05/13/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: Gloria Estefan... ENOUGH! - Ralph Hahn 09:18:44 05/14/08 (0)
WABC Rewound Preview From Johnny Donovan - Allan Sniffen 20:35:25 05/13/08 (2)
- Re: WABC Rewound Preview From Johnny Donovan - Bob T. 18:40:34 05/14/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: WABC Rewound Preview From Johnny Donovan - Frank Saracino 20:35:35 05/15/08 (0)
A new Fybush - Scott Fybush 10:47:44 05/13/08 (48)
- Re: A new Fybush - Bob C 16:11:30 05/15/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Ralph Hahn 09:45:33 05/15/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Sid Schweiger 20:44:59 05/14/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: A new Fybush - Jeff Scheckner 09:40:52 05/15/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Bob Smolarek 19:10:39 05/14/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Walt 15:20:46 05/14/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - George Kowal 12:01:40 05/14/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Marty Glenn 11:08:45 05/14/08 (3)
  - Re: Re: A new Fybush - Scott Fybush 16:04:04 05/14/08 (2)
    - Re: Re: Re: A new Fybush - Marty Glenn 01:55:44 05/15/08 (0)
    - Re: Re: Re: A new Fybush - Bob Smith 16:52:03 05/14/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Tracy Carman 09:42:19 05/14/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Michael Judge 08:45:16 05/14/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Roddy Freeman 08:04:32 05/14/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Robert Leu 01:12:29 05/14/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - David Gleason 00:18:12 05/14/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Hugh 23:59:31 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Bill Jaker 22:44:54 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Richard Wagenblast 22:43:42 05/13/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: A new Fybush - John Maher 22:46:15 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - VicFusco 22:27:10 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Marty Brooks 21:56:34 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Mike Singh 17:16:04 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Patrick J Guice 16:45:34 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Steve G 16:42:55 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Hilary 16:29:43 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Mike Piazza 15:39:04 05/13/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: A new Fybush - BarryS 16:05:23 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Tom Carten 15:38:13 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Steve Gilinsky 15:31:34 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Walt Parker 14:23:41 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Joe P. 14:09:20 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - David Gordon 13:31:11 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Bob Smith 13:25:51 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Tony Santiago 13:13:06 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Dave 13:07:01 05/13/08 (1)
- Re: A new Fybush - Matt Craig 12:24:56 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Jimmy 12:08:24 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Peter Q. George 11:38:30 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Rene Tetro 11:37:05 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - David C 11:26:19 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Mike Seaver 11:20:58 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Bob Frable 11:02:07 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - Mary DeSilva 10:58:58 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: A new Fybush - terry morgan 10:56:01 05/13/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: A new Fybush - Steve Green 14:54:29 05/13/08 (0)
Can Satellite Survive the Churn? - Bob T. 09:53:11 05/13/08 (12)
- Re: Can Satellite Survive the Churn? - Bob T. 17:23:04 05/13/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: Can Satellite Survive the Churn? - Barry 21:42:18 05/14/08 (0)
- Re: Can Satellite Survive the Churn? - Philkirk 13:24:01 05/13/08 (7)
  - Re: Re: Can Satellite Survive the Churn? - Barry 13:47:27 05/13/08 (6)
    - Re: Re: Re: Can Satellite Survive the Churn? - Richard Forman 14:13:32 05/13/08 (5)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Can Satellite Survive the Churn? - TomK 18:49:22 05/13/08 (4)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can Satellite Survive the Churn? - Don Tandler 22:14:19 05/13/08 (3)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can Satellite Survive the Churn? - Stu Dolgon 15:40:18 05/14/08 (0)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can Satellite Survive the Churn? - Richard Forman 09:16:55 05/14/08 (1)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can Satellite Survive the Churn? - Brian Black 14:42:58 05/14/08 (0)
- Re: Can Satellite Survive the Churn? - Allan Sniffen 10:33:29 05/13/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: Can Satellite Survive the Churn? - Steve Green 13:33:40 05/13/08 (0)
March PPM's in Daily News - Barry 07:51:27 05/13/08 (16)
- Re: March PPM's in Daily News - Kevin L. Sealy 18:28:26 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: March PPM's in Daily News - Bob Smith 13:36:21 05/13/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: March PPM's in Daily News - David Gleason 10:01:18 05/14/08 (0)
- Re: March PPM's in Daily News - Sean Savage 08:21:31 05/13/08 (12)
  - Re: Re: March PPM's in Daily News - David Gleason 00:24:21 05/14/08 (4)
    - Re: Re: Re: March PPM's in Daily News - Bryan P 08:02:27 05/14/08 (3)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: March PPM's in Daily News - David Gleason 09:45:57 05/14/08 (2)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: March PPM's in Daily News - Bryan P 10:09:09 05/14/08 (1)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: March PPM's in Daily News - David Gleason 16:51:41 05/14/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: March PPM's in Daily News - Jeff J 21:28:34 05/13/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: March PPM's in Daily News - David C 10:36:02 05/13/08 (2)
    - Re: Re: Re: March PPM's in Daily News - Nick 13:41:14 05/13/08 (0)
    - Re: Re: Re: March PPM's in Daily News - Richard A. Riley 12:26:52 05/13/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: March PPM's in Daily News - Barbara Ann 08:58:54 05/13/08 (2)
    - Re: Re: Re: March PPM's in Daily News - Steve 09:15:19 05/13/08 (1)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: March PPM's in Daily News - Greg Tallman 09:18:05 05/13/08 (0)
WABC Rewound Message Board Now Open - Allan Sniffen 18:35:38 05/12/08 (0)
Imus technical problem - steve beach 13:16:29 05/12/08 (0)
Does WNET Get A Pass On F-Bombs? - Barry Weiss 11:44:19 05/12/08 (6)
- Re: Does WNET Get A Pass On F-Bombs? - Rudy Kisely 19:03:20 05/12/08 (3)
  - Re: Re: Does WNET Get A Pass On F-Bombs? - Robert Casey 21:25:09 05/13/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Does WNET Get A Pass On F-Bombs? - Robert Casey 19:25:31 05/12/08 (1)
    - Re: Re: Re: Does WNET Get A Pass On F-Bombs? - David C 11:28:55 05/13/08 (0)
- Re: Does WNET Get A Pass On F-Bombs? - Nick 13:10:48 05/12/08 (0)
- Re: Does WNET Get A Pass On F-Bombs? - johnglassman 12:55:16 05/12/08 (0)
Demos Question - Ron Soldano 08:14:15 05/12/08 (10)
- Re: Demos Question - Dave Mock 08:45:06 05/12/08 (9)
  - Re: Re: Demos Question - Walt 09:15:54 05/12/08 (8)
    - Re: Re: Re: Demos Question - Robert Casey 21:19:01 05/13/08 (0)
    - Re: Re: Re: Demos Question - Richard A. Riley 10:53:22 05/12/08 (1)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Demos Question - John M. 11:38:48 05/13/08 (0)
    - Re: Re: Re: Demos Question - Steve Green 10:06:10 05/12/08 (1)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Demos Question - Mike Seaver 11:06:38 05/12/08 (0)
    - Re: Re: Re: Demos Question - Mike Seaver 09:59:06 05/12/08 (2)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Demos Question - Joseph Owens 11:13:57 05/12/08 (1)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Demos Question - Mike Seaver 11:27:34 05/12/08 (0)
WRXP Ratings - Tom Tortorella 12:36:17 05/11/08 (17)
- Re: WRXP Ratings - Allan Sniffen 20:27:32 05/11/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: WRXP Ratings - Jimmy 10:10:33 05/12/08 (0)
- Re: WRXP Ratings - StevenD 16:25:12 05/11/08 (10)
  - Re: Re: WRXP Ratings - Tom O 22:39:34 05/12/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: WRXP Ratings - Marty Brooks 23:03:07 05/11/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: WRXP Ratings - MikeN 16:50:13 05/11/08 (7)
    - Re: Re: Re: WRXP Ratings - John 17:07:53 05/11/08 (6)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: WRXP Ratings - MikeN 17:17:48 05/11/08 (5)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WRXP Ratings - John Barrett 17:25:39 05/11/08 (4)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WRXP Ratings - Steve Gosset 18:28:13 05/11/08 (3)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WRXP Ratings - John 11:24:55 05/13/08 (2)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WRXP Ratings - David Gleason 16:56:38 05/14/08 (1)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WRXP Ratings - John 10:44:10 05/15/08 (0)
- Re: WRXP Ratings - Steve Green 13:29:25 05/11/08 (2)
  - Re: Re: WRXP Ratings - Steve Gosset 18:30:05 05/11/08 (1)
    - Re: Re: Re: WRXP Ratings - Steve Green 18:17:06 05/12/08 (0)
- Re: WRXP Ratings - Tom 13:29:11 05/11/08 (0)
WABC Day the music died VIDEO - Jonathan Wolfert 04:05:15 05/11/08 (13)
- Re: WABC Day the music died VIDEO - Ralph Hahn 14:15:08 05/12/08 (0)
- Re: WABC Day the music died VIDEO - Bob Schappert 00:29:59 05/12/08 (0)
- Re: WABC Day the music died VIDEO - Allan Sniffen 20:33:31 05/11/08 (2)
  - Re: Re: WABC Day the music died VIDEO - Jonathan Wolfert 03:31:17 05/12/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: WABC Day the music died VIDEO - William Brown 23:35:58 05/11/08 (0)
- Re: WABC Day the music died VIDEO - Tony Santiago 19:38:47 05/11/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: WABC Day the music died VIDEO - Brian Black 23:27:32 05/11/08 (0)
- Re: WABC Day the music died VIDEO - Richard A. Riley 15:55:39 05/11/08 (0)
- Re: WABC Day the music died VIDEO - Pete Kanze 14:56:45 05/11/08 (0)
- Re: WABC Day the music died VIDEO - Eric Margolis 09:26:16 05/11/08 (3)
  - Re: Re: WABC Day the music died VIDEO - Allison Miller 14:08:45 05/11/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: WABC Day the music died VIDEO - Bob Frable 10:14:50 05/11/08 (1)
    - Re: Re: Re: WABC Day the music died VIDEO - Mark 10:32:48 05/11/08 (0)
Early Sunday Morning Programming - Barry 19:30:33 05/10/08 (11)
- Re: Early Sunday Morning Programming - John M. 17:01:42 05/12/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: Early Sunday Morning Programming - DiMarco 19:58:49 05/12/08 (0)
- Re: Early Sunday Morning Programming - KCJackson 15:19:38 05/12/08 (0)
- Re: Early Sunday Morning Programming - mike baker 17:23:13 05/11/08 (0)
- Re: Early Sunday Morning Programming - Bob Smith 22:55:56 05/10/08 (0)
- Re: Early Sunday Morning Programming - Will Burpee 20:34:15 05/10/08 (3)
  - Re: Re: Early Sunday Morning Programming - Allison Miller 11:16:47 05/11/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Early Sunday Morning Programming - Bob Frable 10:34:18 05/11/08 (1)
    - Re: Re: Re: Early Sunday Morning Programming - Tom 13:36:43 05/11/08 (0)
26 Years And Counting... - Bob Gibson 13:49:51 05/10/08 (8)
- Re: 26 Years And Counting... - Pete Kanze 22:08:23 05/10/08 (0)
- Re: 26 Years And Counting... - Ted David 18:50:04 05/10/08 (2)
  - Re: Re: 26 Years And Counting... - Fred Clemens 19:19:31 05/10/08 (1)
    - Re: Re: Re: 26 Years And Counting... - Dave Mock 19:33:52 05/10/08 (0)
- Re: 26 Years And Counting... - ScottyMac 17:29:35 05/10/08 (0)
- Re: 26 Years And Counting... - Kevin L. Sealy 16:52:14 05/10/08 (2)
  - Re: Re: 26 Years And Counting... - Bob Gibson 09:33:44 05/11/08 (1)
    - Re: Re: Re: 26 Years And Counting... - Kevin L. Sealy 18:08:18 05/12/08 (0)
HD2 NYC Good News/Bad News - Bob Harrison 09:41:30 05/10/08 (8)
- Re: HD2 NYC Good News/Bad News - Dave Duncan 20:32:33 05/10/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: HD2 NYC Good News/Bad News - Barry 21:10:43 05/10/08 (0)
- Re: HD2 NYC Good News/Bad News - Marty Brooks 10:37:56 05/10/08 (2)
  - Re: Re: HD2 NYC Good News/Bad News - Bob Harrison 16:09:15 05/10/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: HD2 NYC Good News/Bad News - John Barrett 10:57:31 05/10/08 (0)
- Re: HD2 NYC Good News/Bad News - Barry 10:06:01 05/10/08 (2)
  - Re: Re: HD2 NYC Good News/Bad News - Greg Tallman 13:07:38 05/10/08 (1)
    - Re: Re: Re: HD2 NYC Good News/Bad News - Dave 17:59:14 05/10/08 (0)
Endless Wait For F.C.C. Satellite Merger Decision Unfair - Barry 13:39:24 05/09/08 (14)
- Re: Endless Wait For F.C.C. Satellite Merger Decision Unfair - Bob T. 15:48:45 05/09/08 (0)
- Re: Endless Wait For F.C.C. Satellite Merger Decision Unfair - SKlein 14:10:36 05/09/08 (11)
  - Re: Re: Endless Wait For F.C.C. Satellite Merger Decision Unfair - Mike 14:19:17 05/09/08 (10)
    - Re: Re: Re: Endless Wait For F.C.C. Satellite Merger Decision Unfair - john glassman 14:45:35 05/09/08 (9)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Endless Wait For F.C.C. Satellite Merger Decision Unfair - Mike Seaver 14:01:13 05/10/08 (5)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Endless Wait For F.C.C. Satellite Merger Decision Unfair - Joseph Owens 16:03:48 05/10/08 (4)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Endless Wait For F.C.C. Satellite Merger Decision Unfair - Mike Seaver 17:49:28 05/10/08 (1)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Endless Wait For F.C.C. Satellite Merger Decision Unfair - Joseph Owens 19:10:52 05/10/08 (0)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Endless Wait For F.C.C. Satellite Merger Decision Unfair - Jerome 16:14:30 05/10/08 (1)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Endless Wait For F.C.C. Satellite Merger Decision Unfair - Mike Seaver 17:50:37 05/10/08 (0)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Endless Wait For F.C.C. Satellite Merger Decision Unfair - Mike 15:38:57 05/09/08 (2)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Endless Wait For F.C.C. Satellite Merger Decision Unfair - Paul Stamato 16:16:24 05/09/08 (0)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Endless Wait For F.C.C. Satellite Merger Decision Unfair - SKlein 15:44:02 05/09/08 (0)
JJ Kennedy on WFAS AM 1230 - Tom Tortorella 09:07:41 05/09/08 (13)
- Re: JJ Kennedy on WFAS AM 1230 - Frank 13:38:55 05/09/08 (12)
  - Re: Re: JJ Kennedy on WFAS AM 1230 - Steve Green 09:48:50 05/10/08 (11)
    - Re: Re: Re: JJ Kennedy on WFAS AM 1230 - Tom O'Hanlon 23:07:17 05/12/08 (0)
    - Re: Re: Re: JJ Kennedy on WFAS AM 1230 - Marty Glenn 16:54:30 05/10/08 (4)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: JJ Kennedy on WFAS AM 1230 - Anthony St James 20:14:13 05/13/08 (0)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: JJ Kennedy on WFAS AM 1230 - Bob Smolarek 09:52:21 05/11/08 (2)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: JJ Kennedy on WFAS AM 1230 - Jerome 13:27:13 05/11/08 (0)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: JJ Kennedy on WFAS AM 1230 - Tom Tortorella 12:28:29 05/11/08 (0)
    - Re: Re: Re: JJ Kennedy on WFAS AM 1230 - Gerry Grasso 14:18:57 05/10/08 (4)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: JJ Kennedy on WFAS AM 1230 - Kevin L. Sealy 17:00:49 05/10/08 (2)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: JJ Kennedy on WFAS AM 1230 - Gerry Grasso 21:38:36 05/10/08 (0)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: JJ Kennedy on WFAS AM 1230 - Will Burpee 20:30:29 05/10/08 (0)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: JJ Kennedy on WFAS AM 1230 - Marty Glenn 16:49:47 05/10/08 (0)
Imus Radiothon - Chris DeBello 08:58:06 05/09/08 (10)
- Re: Imus Radiothon - Michael D 13:32:43 05/12/08 (0)
- Re: Imus Radiothon - Bennett 13:18:04 05/09/08 (3)
  - Re: Re: Imus Radiothon - Rich 23:17:57 05/09/08 (1)
    - Re: Re: Re: Imus Radiothon - Brian Black 00:38:42 05/10/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Imus Radiothon - Joseph Owens 13:37:58 05/09/08 (0)
- Re: Imus Radiothon - KCJackson 10:03:36 05/09/08 (4)
  - Re: Re: Imus Radiothon - Bob Frable 10:22:23 05/11/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Imus Radiothon - Sol 11:31:37 05/09/08 (2)
    - Re: Re: Re: Imus Radiothon - KCJackson 12:11:13 05/09/08 (1)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Imus Radiothon - RichardW 18:20:17 05/09/08 (0)
Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Dan A 23:59:15 05/08/08 (46)
- Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Allan Sniffen 06:47:12 05/09/08 (30)
  - Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Richard Forman 14:02:09 05/09/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Jimmy 12:17:24 05/09/08 (6)
    - Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Jeff Scheckner 14:52:28 05/09/08 (0)
    - Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Allan Sniffen 12:24:38 05/09/08 (4)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Robert Casey 20:56:26 05/09/08 (0)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Jimmy 12:35:44 05/09/08 (2)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Allan Sniffen 12:57:52 05/09/08 (1)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Robert Casey 21:07:07 05/09/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Barry 10:27:45 05/09/08 (4)
    - Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Allan Sniffen 11:03:44 05/09/08 (3)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Barry 11:25:11 05/09/08 (2)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Allan Sniffen 11:56:15 05/09/08 (0)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - KCJackson 11:28:01 05/09/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Bob Smith 09:17:11 05/09/08 (16)
    - Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Allan Sniffen 10:08:20 05/09/08 (15)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Brett Alan 14:02:48 05/09/08 (12)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Bob Smith 22:45:31 05/10/08 (0)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - David Gleason 19:59:04 05/09/08 (10)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Brett Alan 01:53:37 05/10/08 (9)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - David Gleason 10:40:08 05/10/08 (8)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Brett Alan 16:02:34 05/10/08 (3)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - David Gleason 00:22:49 05/11/08 (2)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Brett Alan 00:33:41 05/11/08 (1)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Walt 09:44:06 05/11/08 (0)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Allan Sniffen 10:58:23 05/10/08 (3)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Scott Fybush 19:16:44 05/10/08 (2)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Craig 21:30:37 05/10/08 (0)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Barry 19:36:33 05/10/08 (0)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Scott Fybush 11:51:54 05/09/08 (1)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Walt 12:06:57 05/10/08 (0)
- Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Anthony Attanasio 00:22:47 05/09/08 (14)
  - Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Walt 09:12:07 05/09/08 (1)
    - Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Dan A 11:47:28 05/09/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Allan Sniffen 07:50:47 05/09/08 (11)
    - Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Paul 00:04:39 05/10/08 (0)
    - Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Anthony Attanasio 10:58:28 05/09/08 (8)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Dan A 17:04:30 05/09/08 (2)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Anthony Attanasio 22:46:00 05/09/08 (1)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Anthony Attanasio 22:50:36 05/09/08 (0)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Allan Sniffen 11:07:04 05/09/08 (4)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Walt 12:31:26 05/09/08 (2)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Allan Sniffen 17:17:21 05/09/08 (0)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Brett Alan 13:55:41 05/09/08 (0)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Anthony Attanasio 11:09:51 05/09/08 (0)
    - Re: Re: Re: Had Jack been put on 92.3 or 102.7 - Steve Green 09:45:32 05/09/08 (0)
Format Changes - Barbara Ann 18:47:27 05/08/08 (43)
- Re: Format Changes - Kevin L. Sealy 18:28:12 05/09/08 (0)
- Re: Format Changes - terry morgan 07:36:59 05/09/08 (4)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - Jim 01:41:34 05/10/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - al germond 11:05:49 05/09/08 (2)
    - Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - terry morgan 12:22:42 05/09/08 (1)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - al germond 23:34:37 05/09/08 (0)
- Re: Format Changes - VicFusco 21:31:16 05/08/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - Nick 22:13:28 05/08/08 (0)
- Re: Format Changes - Paul 21:24:14 05/08/08 (0)
- Re: Format Changes - Hank Knox 21:17:07 05/08/08 (4)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - Nick 22:26:35 05/08/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - Jerome J. Slote 21:35:48 05/08/08 (2)
    - Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - Tony Santiago 22:46:24 05/09/08 (1)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - Jerome 11:03:42 05/10/08 (0)
- Re: Format Changes - MJRosenbluth 20:51:36 05/08/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - Steve Green 09:57:01 05/09/08 (0)
- Re: Format Changes - Dave Duncan 20:27:58 05/08/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - Tony Santiago 22:47:29 05/09/08 (0)
- Re: Format Changes - Bryan 20:20:31 05/08/08 (7)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - al germond 11:37:32 05/09/08 (5)
    - Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - Scott Fybush 12:00:28 05/09/08 (4)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - Will Burpee 12:47:42 05/09/08 (1)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - al germond 00:55:49 05/10/08 (0)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - terry morgan 12:39:13 05/09/08 (1)
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - Scott Fybush 22:52:00 05/09/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - Nick 21:10:39 05/08/08 (0)
- Re: Format Changes - Jason 19:56:23 05/08/08 (3)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - Marty Glenn 03:31:46 05/09/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - Bryan 20:09:35 05/08/08 (1)
    - Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - al germond 20:21:27 05/08/08 (0)
- Re: Format Changes - John Barrett 19:15:59 05/08/08 (4)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - Nick 19:41:50 05/08/08 (2)
    - Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - Marty Glenn 03:39:32 05/09/08 (1)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - Nick 13:50:05 05/09/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - Dave DuBrow 19:31:58 05/08/08 (0)
- Re: Format Changes - Hugh 19:04:29 05/08/08 (6)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - Barbara Ann 19:23:47 05/08/08 (2)
    - Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - Marty Brooks 23:27:42 05/08/08 (1)
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - al germond 12:09:38 05/09/08 (0)
  - Re: Re: Format Changes - Don Tandler 19:18:13 05/08/08 (2)
    - Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - Roddy Freeman 10:29:28 05/09/08 (0)
    - Re: Re: Re: Format Changes - Hugh 23:52:04 05/08/08 (0)
- Re: Format Changes - Tom Tortorella 18:57:28 05/08/08 (0)
scott and todd to dc? - mike 16:18:49 05/08/08 (3)
- Re: scott and todd to dc? - StevenD 22:30:18 05/08/08 (1)
  - Re: Re: scott and todd to dc? - Lyons 16:08:11 05/09/08 (0)
- Re: scott and todd to dc? - Joe P. 17:39:01 05/08/08 (0)
Post A Message!

Name: (no handles!)
E-Mail: (optional)
Subject:
Message:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

Click here to e mail the moderator of the NYRMB
This board has been accessed 19201110 times since 3/22/98

New York Radio Message Board

Click RELOAD on Your Browser To See New Posts!

Post A Message!